jankren wrote:
|
I understand your opinion yet I believe extreme freedom of expression is one of the strengths of this site which makes it different than others.
|
Andya Primanda wrote:
|
Too bad, Ahmed, I like your views...
|
Andya Primanda wrote:
|
Maybe if you cool down a bit then you'll be able to rejoin us.
|
Andya Primanda wrote:
|
Please don't go out and make your own sect.
|
drshabeer wrote:
|
Peace Brothers n Sisters..
|
drshabeer wrote:
|
United We stand.. Divided We Fall...
|
drshabeer wrote:
|
I had read some informative Articles from Brother Ahmed...
|
drshabeer wrote:
|
And sometimes Good Criticisms...
|
drshabeer wrote:
|
This should not have happened here....
Shabeer
|
Fati wrote:
|
Selam brother AB
A new beginning
It should not have heppened but it happened and sometimes the happenings are the means for a new start as in the case of yours. I only hope and pray that Allah will reward and support you.
Peace,
FJ
|
Fati wrote:
|
Peace
Bro AB is there a way to delete a post or is this option available to you only. I posted the same post twice unintentionally and wanted to delete but could not find the way to do that.
Peace
Fati
|
Atreides wrote:
|
Peace bro Ahmed,
Good to see you have your own site now, hopefully, I will add my bit in various discussions. You might already know me, as I'm one of the oft-hated mods on FM.
Just to clarify, your thread wasn't deleted but can be found in the Forum Suggestions category. Good luck with your site, I look forward to your insights and your understanding regarding certain subjects.
Nadya
|
Atreides wrote:
|
I like it here phoenix, it's quite good. Hopefully more people will start contributing, I'm looking forward to seeing the fireworks that kinda follow bro Ahmed wherever he goes. If there's action I'm there.
|
pikachu wrote:
|
salaam ahmed,
it's me, rifat. your web site looks really good. nice job. do you know why you got banned by "magi" for a month. i was not active at the moment you received the ban. why???
peace, rifat
|
rifat wrote:
|
salaam, everyone,
from my perspective, Mr. Ahmed baghat seemed a little on the "traditional" side.
|
rifat wrote:
|
(nothing wrong with practicing and setting up an example for others but something wrong when you refute others with a mind of injustice and arrogant assertiveness.),
|
rifat wrote:
|
i hate the idea of calling people kafirs! it is absurd and illogical because your insults has no influence on whether i can breath or not.
|
rifat wrote:
|
if Ahmed called someone i know "kafir" he had the right to be banned.
|
rifat wrote:
|
but what hot button issue made him react to this level?
|
rifat wrote:
|
only Allah has the full use and power to label kafir,
|
rifat wrote:
|
otherwise from the perspective of Allah, it is meaningless because we do not decide which chemicals combine with which, it is Allah that decides!
peace, rifat
|
Magi wrote:
|
Peace
His behaviour and way to adresss other people got him banned. I wont go into detail, as he is not here to defend himself. The last thing Islam needs are more selfrightious mullahs. Nomatter if it is Quran alone or not.
|
phoenix1 wrote:
|
Peace Ahmed,
Good job with the new website.
|
phoenix1 wrote:
|
You shouldn't have left. I can't say that some of the comments you posted were fine,
|
phoenix1 wrote:
|
but we will miss the good points you had to add to the discussions.
|
phoenix1 wrote:
|
I know that it hurts when someone "attacks" what we believe is true. But we have to realize that they too strongly believe in what they believe.
|
phoenix1 wrote:
|
We cannot assume to know everything. We cannot act arrogantly. Act like we are never wrong. Only God knows for sure.
|
phoenix1 wrote:
|
I asked Nabster if he thought that he was ever wrong. And he never answered that question. That, to me, is utter arrogance. And I have seen you act arrogantly as well.
So I'll ask you this question, Ahmed, can you ever be wrong?
|
Quote:
|
I would like to add in response to the posts made about Layth on this thread, since he isn't here to defend himself:
|
Quote:
|
Danish and enquirer have both been banned as well for their derogatory comments. Sometimes it takes time and some patience for them to cross the line irrevocably but it does happen.
|
Quote:
|
It might feel unjustified to us but it is across the board in the big picture. Danish was singing our praises one day and then when he got banned, he sent emails that show a different story.
|
Quote:
|
I appreciate the fact that you say what you think and are honest about it, it might not be appropriate in some places the way you choose to convey it BUT there isn't any waffling or hypocrisy that I see from your end which has to be respected.
|
Quote:
|
I wouldn't mind seeing some epic debates with Danish and enquirer on this forum but tbh, I doubt they can debate with any pretense of logic for it to be worth my time.
|
Quote:
|
Hes most welcome to come and have as many rounds of talks he wishes, or maybe he has henna on this hands lol!
|
Quote:
|
This makes it clearer that they were kept to distract Ahmed's attention because Layth couldnt stand critisim to his articles. Come on! Sister, its appearant that you folks ignored the complaints and kept your eyes close towards their behaviour and whenever bro Ahmed took stand he was warned/banned.
|
Quote:
|
They were kept for a purpose ie to make Ahmed go and when he left, they were kicked. LOL! this is what bro Ahmed call tryant policy.
|
Quote:
|
Here I agree with you in last couple of months on times bro Ahmed attitute wasnt appropriate BUT whos fault is it? I would say hypocritic attitute of fm. Number of times mquran complained and pointed the famous rule 2 of fm, who listened? many more examples but lets not agrue.
|
Quote:
|
So nice of you to say this, but sorry I never saw these kinda comments on fm from you.
|
Quote:
|
Let me tell you, that there will be on admin/mod might abuse here on FI. Bro Ahmed and myself had loads of discussions on how FI mods will react and have a pretty good plan about it, its a matter of time and inshallah you will see FI one of the fairest islamic forum for muslims of all walks.
|
Quote:
|
A very happy Eid to you and to your family!
|
Atreides wrote:
|
Np at all. I appreciate you taking the time to fix things like this.
|
Atreides wrote:
|
I would like to add in response to the posts made about Layth on this thread, since he isn't here to defend himself:
|
Atreides wrote:
|
Danish and enquirer have both been banned as well for their derogatory comments.
|
Atreides wrote:
|
Sometimes it takes time and some patience for them to cross the line irrevocably but it does happen.
|
Atreides wrote:
|
It might feel unjustified to us but it is across the board in the big picture.
|
Atreides wrote:
|
Danish was singing our praises one day and then when he got banned, he sent emails that show a different story.
|
Atreides wrote:
|
I appreciate the fact that you say what you think and are honest about it, it might not be appropriate in some places the way you choose to convey it BUT there isn't any waffling or hypocrisy that I see from your end which has to be respected.
|
Atreides wrote:
|
I wouldn't mind seeing some epic debates with Danish and enquirer on this forum but tbh, I doubt they can debate with any pretense of logic for it to be worth my time.
|
Quote:
|
No worries, I'm still pulling my hair trying to get the flash, audio/video streaming and the rest of BBcode objects that you see when you post to work, even finding someone to do it with money is hard, I already asked one and i didn't hear from him yet, i hope i do
|
Quote:
|
That is why FI forum is open for the public to read, he can even join and refute me back the way he wishes, at least I can assure him that he won't be banned as he did with me while i was standing up for his religion
the matter is simply this dear sister, they bloody keep repeating their non sense after it has been refuted, they are one of the main reason of the down fall of FM and the loss of many good quran students like brother Mquran and sister Myr for example
I see it more than an unjustifiable minor act, i see it as a crime against the Muslims who already are divided and confused because of the many who hijacked the religion, now we don't want some ignorant or arrogant to come and disturb a group of Muslims studying the Quran and trying hard to resolve that division and confusion that exist for decades, they can come and raise their concerns once and for all, if refuted, fair enough and if not refuted, also fair enough, but for them to keep repeating unfounded illusions, it will sure serve its purpose which is confusing the Muslims further and this act is actually blessed by FM webmaster as far I have seen for almost a year
A word "tough or Kind" to stop a perpetrator is quite enough as far as I can see it from a webmaster point of view, banning is tyrancy and an act of cowardice, look at what happened to that young man who got into trouble with Mquran “I forgot his name”, straight away he was banned for life, then sister peacefulmuslim tried hard to overturn the banning then no one listened , only they locked the thread and insisted on the life sentence given to him, another cowardly act,
They are welcome to join FI, they will never be banned as it happened to them on FM, but what I want them to comply with is simply as what Mquran always asked them to do which is to respond to the refutes presented by other Muslim brothers and sisters, then they have the freedom to agree or disagree but they can't keep ranting about it, it just causes confusion to the Muslims, however and to be honest, I'm happy that they keep ranting about it until a Muslim reply to them with Logical Quran Evidences, but they are too arrogant to accept any logic presented that a child will comprehend and what they do after is simply ranting again and again and again, this is not going to happen on FI, yet i will not take any decision to what to do with them based on my own desires, rather on what the majority of the Muslim community here vote to do with them and yet I will not allow permanent banning or even lengthy one, because for me it is not constitutional to stop one for life from their freedom of speech
|
Atreides wrote:
|
You'll work it out, O master of VB!
|
Atreides wrote:
|
The running problems in all your quotes above are twofold brother.
|
Atreides wrote:
|
You say you don't want them banned YET you want them to comply.
|
Atreides wrote:
|
What if their arguments have been refuted time and time again and YET they keep at it which is what everyone is so pissed off at,
|
Atreides wrote:
|
as ruining the atmosphere and confusing new members?
|
Atreides wrote:
|
You can't have it both ways.
|
Atreides wrote:
|
There is no magic bullet to make people comply virtually.
|
Atreides wrote:
|
What we do after seeing that they are not interested in listening, is ban them after they have received ample warning (during which members start getting pissed that nothing is happening and they want them gone but they don't want to be the ones that do it, so someone has to step up to the plate).
|
Atreides wrote:
|
Arguing with these types, serves NO purpose because they aren't interested in learning from your point of view, they are trolling for validation.
|
Atreides wrote:
|
That's it. If you want to take them on, eventually it regresses into a downward spiral of personal attacks, comments and rudeness which I despise. There is nothing constructive about that.
|
Atreides wrote:
|
Mq talked about getting them to comply or be banned but this is not what you are saying, you don't want them banned.
|
Atreides wrote:
|
I agree with him, if they don't comply with the rules they get banned.
|
Atreides wrote:
|
Simply put. Sometimes it takes time, sometimes it's instantaneous in the past. The rules were revised to make it consistent since some time now. The young guy that PM was talking about had a sordid history that I became aware of which I can't talk about in public. It was justified that he got banned, I wouldn't want someone like that around either.
|
Atreides wrote:
|
If you're going to go by the whims of the majority, it's up to you.
|
Atreides wrote:
|
I don't find that very practical and fair in practice because the members usually have an axe to grind against someone they have debated with and 'lost' or just don't like because of any given reason.
|
Atreides wrote:
|
They would vote for a ban, you say you don't want a lengthy one so the time would be a week let's say? They will be back and there will still be dissatisfaction and the same problems once again, until the members sit down and decide, okay another week then during which time those that don't like the atmosphere will leave as happened on FM and as happens on other boards where the mudslinging and general chaos doesn't suit some types.
|
Atreides wrote:
|
Don't get me wrong, I wish all the best for the board but I dislike participating in atmospheres where flaming is rampant and abusive comments are directed to people and where those that perpetrate such behaviour are not kicked out for good.
|
Atreides wrote:
|
You will find however that banning is suited for the majority of boards where people want smooth and efficient running.
|
Atreides wrote:
|
It is not 'unconstitutional' in the least because your forum is your domain where you have people who sign an agreement with you before they participate. I participate on many boards comprising of different genre's and banning is something preferred for obvious reasons.
|
Atreides wrote:
|
Forgot to add, since i clicked the post button instead of preview, eid mubarak to you as well.
|
Quote:
|
I wish it was VB sister, it is PHP and I absolutely have no knowledge in that department, the language looks simple after investigating its syntax but it will still take me at least 6 months to a year to master that language, what is motivating me to master it is simply this, part of what I do is design LAN applications, all MS SQL driven and almost now days all my clients require WAN connectivity to their LAN applications and this is hard to do unless you have a very fast WAN connection, like 10 MB/S at least , so I have to resort to further infrastructure and cost by implementing Windows 2003 Terminal server, and yet it is not as fast but it is very centralised in regards to management and this is a huge bonus on its own, if I master PHP then I can build all my lan applications using it due to the fact that php is designed with database connectivity in mind and as its heart, so running the php applications over a wan connection will be exactly like running this site, i.e. no need for any extra infrastructure and yet can be centrally managed through one web server sitting on the LAN, I hope I can do this actually, I looked at ebay for books and there are plenty so I have another challenge in hand, I already joined a few php communities but the one I'm using "BonusNuke" is new and hardly any support for it “for the tough issues and many bugs i mean”, sorry to bore you
|
Atreides wrote:
|
No you didn't bore me at all, I like reading technical stuff right before I go to bed. Best sleep ever!
|
Atreides wrote:
|
More to the point though, why did you choose the BonusNuke over the others? Any reason comparatively?
|
Atreides wrote:
|
Oh and is there a way we can increase the size of the window in which we type before posting? It's way too small. I think that would be doable if you just look at the way it's set up, the parameters and all.
|
Atreides wrote:
|
This post is way to long for me to respond to briefly and I don't want to highlight my cynicism too much either, let's just say if you ever need any help, please don't hesitate to ask. I want to see this board take off and of course the epic debates
|
Thank you sister, my reply was just expressing my opinion, i was not debating anything, so please don't get me wrong and thanks for your offer of help, there is no doubt that i will need every help I can from those sincere ones who want free-islam to evolve into something useful to all Msulims and non Muslims
Salam
All times are GMT + 10 Hours
Powered by phpBB 2.0 .0.17 © 2001
phpBB
Group