www.free-islam.com

Bring it on - Did prophet Ayoub beat his wife ?

- Fri 09 Nov, 2007 1:21 pm
Post subject: Did prophet Ayoub beat his wife ?
Salam brother BMZ

Let me prove to you and to the public the ignorance of the goons like trojan the donkey, manfrog, mersick and ugly shitface

The goons lie and tell us that the Quran said that prophet Ayoub was ordered to beat his wife with something, let�?????�????�???�??�?�¢??s just assume with a stick.

Now in no place in the Quran I have read that prophet Ayoub was ordered to beat his wife, I�?????�????�???�??�?�¢??m not saying that this never happened, what I�?????�????�???�??�?�¢??m saying that the Quran never said so, therefore any other source of information may be contaminated and there will be no obligation on the Muslims to accept such conjecture unless it is proven in the Quran

Now let me show the goons some examples that will expose their ignorance with ease, assume that I will give you a stick or anything and ask you to beat ugly shitface with it however you asked me to beat the arse of manfrog with it instead, and I agreed, as you can see in both cases the one that will be beaten must be mentioned to constitute a complete logic, i.e I asked you to beat ugly shitface while you wanted to beat the arse of filthy manfrog, i.e. what will be beaten is mentioned, in this case it is either ugly shitface or the arse of filthy manfrog

Now we can replace ugly shitface with the damir Hu because he is masculine (unfortunate to the male race) or we can replace the arse of filthy manfrog with the damir Ha because filthy manfrog arse is feminine

i.e.

Idrabhu for ugly shit face

or

Idrabha for the filthy arse of manfrog

As you can see both damirs (Hu or Ha) must be attached to the verb Idrab

a clear example for the blind and ignorant goons is 4:34 where Allah told the wise husbands to beat their perverted wives, let�?????�????�???�??�?�¢??s have a look at the verse:

الرِّجَالُ قَوَّامُونَ عَلَى النِّسَاء بِمَا فَضَّلَ اللّهُ بَعْضَهُمْ عَلَى بَعْضٍ وَبِمَا أَنفَقُواْ مِنْ أَمْوَالِهِمْ فَالصَّالِحَاتُ قَانِتَاتٌ حَافِظَاتٌ لِّلْغَيْبِ بِمَا حَفِظَ اللّهُ وَاللاَّتِي تَخَافُونَ نُشُوزَهُنَّ فَعِظُوهُنَّ وَاهْجُرُوهُنَّ فِي الْمَضَاجِعِ وَاضْرِبُوهُنَّ فَإِنْ أَطَعْنَكُمْ فَلاَ تَبْغُواْ عَلَيْهِنَّ سَبِيلاً إِنَّ اللّهَ كَانَ عَلِيًّا كَبِيرًا (34)

[The Quran ; 4:34]

Men are the maintainers of women because Allah has made some of them to excel others and because they spend out of their property; the good women are therefore obedient, guarding the unseen as Allah has guarded; and (as to) those on whose part you fear desertion, admonish them, and leave them alone in the sleeping-places and beat them; then if they obey you, do not seek a way against them; surely Allah is High, Great.


-> As you can see above the perverted wives were replaced by the damir Hunna and the damir is attached to the word Idrab: اضْرِبُوهُنَّ , i.e. beat them, i.e. the entity that will be beaten is mentioned

Another clear example goes where no damir is used but the entity that will be beaten is mentioned explicitly by name::

وَإِذِ اسْتَسْقَى مُوسَى لِقَوْمِهِ فَقُلْنَا اضْرِب بِّعَصَاكَ الْحَجَرَ فَانفَجَرَتْ مِنْهُ اثْنَتَا عَشْرَةَ عَيْناً قَدْ عَلِمَ كُلُّ أُنَاسٍ مَّشْرَبَهُمْ كُلُواْ وَاشْرَبُواْ مِن رِّزْقِ اللَّهِ وَلاَ تَعْثَوْاْ فِي الأَرْضِ مُفْسِدِينَ (60)

[Al Quran ; 2:60]

And when Musa prayed seeking water for his people, We said: Strike the rock with your staff; then gushed from it twelve springs, each group of people knew its drinking place: Eat and drink of the subsistence of Allah and do not act corruptly in the land, making mischief.


-> See above: اضْرِب بِّعَصَاكَ الْحَجَرَ, i.e. Strike the rock with your staff, see, what should be beaten is mentioned by name and in this case it is the rock

Let me show you more examples to confirm to the ignorance of those dumb bums who are living their corrupt barbie and hadith world and ignoring the Quran or manipulating it to suit their filthy and low desires:

فَقُلْنَا اضْرِبُوهُ بِبَعْضِهَا كَذَلِكَ يُحْيِي اللّهُ الْمَوْتَى وَيُرِيكُمْ آيَاتِهِ لَعَلَّكُمْ تَعْقِلُونَ (73)

[Al Quran ; 2:73]

Then We said: Strike him (the deceased) with part of it (the slain cow), thus Allah brings the dead to life, and He shows you His signs so that you may understand.


-> See mate, it is about the cow that Allah ordered to Jews to slay and strike a human dead body with it so he will be revived and tell them who killed him, in the verse above the human dead body was replaced with the damir Hu and the damir is attached to the word Idrab: اضْرِبُوهُ , i.e. strike him

Here is another example:

فَأَوْحَيْنَا إِلَى مُوسَى أَنِ اضْرِب بِّعَصَاكَ الْبَحْرَ فَانفَلَقَ فَكَانَ كُلُّ فِرْقٍ كَالطَّوْدِ الْعَظِيمِ (63)

[The Quran ; 26:63]

Then We revealed to Musa: Strike the sea with your staff. So it had cloven asunder, and each part was like a huge mound.


-> See, اضْرِب بِّعَصَاكَ الْبَحْرَ , i.e. Strike the sea with your staff[b], again we are told what Moses needed to strike and in this case it is [b]the sea

Now, if I give the staff and just told you to Idrab Biha period, i.e. I never informed you with what to strike then it can mean zillions of things, possibly beat trojan the donkey or ugly shitface, or manfrog filthy arse, or deluded mersick or a cow or a car, bloody zillions of things

Let�?????�????�???�??�?�¢??s now look at the verse provided by the donkey trojan and see if the freak has a point:

وَخُذْ بِيَدِكَ ضِغْثًا فَاضْرِب بِّهِ وَلَا تَحْنَثْ إِنَّا وَجَدْنَاهُ صَابِرًا نِعْمَ الْعَبْدُ إِنَّهُ أَوَّابٌ (44)

[The Quran ; 38:44]

here is Yusuf Ali and Picthal translations:

YUSUFALI: And take in thy hand a little grass, and strike therewith: and break not (thy oath). Truly We found him full of patience and constancy. How excellent in Our service! ever did he turn (to Us)!

PICKTHAL: And (it was said unto him): Take in thine hand a branch and smite therewith, and break not thine oath. Lo! We found him steadfast, how excellent a slave! Lo! he was ever turning in repentance (to his Lord).


LOL

-> See dear brother how I got the confused goons red handed with ease, what a show:

-> Here is what the verse above told us: فَاضْرِب بِّهِ , and as translated by the above two : and strike therewith & and smite therewith, i.e. we were not told what Ayoub should have beaten, it can be zillions of things, here it is again: possibly his wife or the ground, or the sea, or a dead body, or a sheep or a cow, or a filthy kafir like ugly shitface, or a punk of a kafir like donkey trojan or a sick of a kafir like mersick or a hero like you or an arse kicker like me, LOL, zillions of things mate

That is the mother of all slam dunks don�?????�????�???�??�?�¢??t you reckon dear brother?

Here it is just in case you reckon?:


Take care
- Sat 10 Nov, 2007 3:34 am
Post subject: Re: Did prophet Ayoub beat his wife ?
AhmedBahgat wrote:
Salam brother BMZ

Let me prove to you and to the public the ignorance of the goons like trojan the donkey, manfrog, mersick and ugly shitface

The goons lie and tell us that the Quran said that prophet Ayoub was ordered to beat his wife with something, let�?????�????�???�??�?�¢??s just assume with a stick.

Now in no place in the Quran I have read that prophet Ayoub was ordered to beat his wife, I�?????�????�???�??�?�¢??m not saying that this never happened, what I�?????�????�???�??�?�¢??m saying that the Quran never said so, therefore any other source of information may be contaminated and there will be no obligation on the Muslims to accept such conjecture unless it is proven in the Quran

Now let me show the goons some examples that will expose their ignorance with ease, assume that I will give you a stick or anything and ask you to beat ugly shitface with it however you asked me to beat the arse of manfrog with it instead, and I agreed, as you can see in both cases the one that will be beaten must be mentioned to constitute a complete logic, i.e I asked you to beat ugly shitface while you wanted to beat the arse of filthy manfrog, i.e. what will be beaten is mentioned, in this case it is either ugly shitface or the arse of filthy manfrog

Now we can replace ugly shitface with the damir Hu because he is masculine (unfortunate to the male race) or we can replace the arse of filthy manfrog with the damir Ha because filthy manfrog arse is feminine

i.e.

Idrabhu for ugly shit face

or

Idrabha for the filthy arse of manfrog

As you can see both damirs (Hu or Ha) must be attached to the verb Idrab

a clear example for the blind and ignorant goons is 4:34 where Allah told the wise husbands to beat their perverted wives, let�?????�????�???�??�?�¢??s have a look at the verse:

الرِّجَالُ قَوَّامُونَ عَلَى النِّسَاء بِمَا فَضَّلَ اللّهُ بَعْضَهُمْ عَلَى بَعْضٍ وَبِمَا أَنفَقُواْ مِنْ أَمْوَالِهِمْ فَالصَّالِحَاتُ قَانِتَاتٌ حَافِظَاتٌ لِّلْغَيْبِ بِمَا حَفِظَ اللّهُ وَاللاَّتِي تَخَافُونَ نُشُوزَهُنَّ فَعِظُوهُنَّ وَاهْجُرُوهُنَّ فِي الْمَضَاجِعِ وَاضْرِبُوهُنَّ فَإِنْ أَطَعْنَكُمْ فَلاَ تَبْغُواْ عَلَيْهِنَّ سَبِيلاً إِنَّ اللّهَ كَانَ عَلِيًّا كَبِيرًا (34)

[The Quran ; 4:34]

Men are the maintainers of women because Allah has made some of them to excel others and because they spend out of their property; the good women are therefore obedient, guarding the unseen as Allah has guarded; and (as to) those on whose part you fear desertion, admonish them, and leave them alone in the sleeping-places and beat them; then if they obey you, do not seek a way against them; surely Allah is High, Great.


-> As you can see above the perverted wives were replaced by the damir Hunna and the damir is attached to the word Idrab: اضْرِبُوهُنَّ , i.e. beat them, i.e. the entity that will be beaten is mentioned

Another clear example goes where no damir is used but the entity that will be beaten is mentioned explicitly by name::

وَإِذِ اسْتَسْقَى مُوسَى لِقَوْمِهِ فَقُلْنَا اضْرِب بِّعَصَاكَ الْحَجَرَ فَانفَجَرَتْ مِنْهُ اثْنَتَا عَشْرَةَ عَيْناً قَدْ عَلِمَ كُلُّ أُنَاسٍ مَّشْرَبَهُمْ كُلُواْ وَاشْرَبُواْ مِن رِّزْقِ اللَّهِ وَلاَ تَعْثَوْاْ فِي الأَرْضِ مُفْسِدِينَ (60)

[Al Quran ; 2:60]

And when Musa prayed seeking water for his people, We said: Strike the rock with your staff; then gushed from it twelve springs, each group of people knew its drinking place: Eat and drink of the subsistence of Allah and do not act corruptly in the land, making mischief.


-> See above: اضْرِب بِّعَصَاكَ الْحَجَرَ, i.e. Strike the rock with your staff, see, what should be beaten is mentioned by name and in this case it is the rock

Let me show you more examples to confirm to the ignorance of those dumb bums who are living their corrupt barbie and hadith world and ignoring the Quran or manipulating it to suit their filthy and low desires:

فَقُلْنَا اضْرِبُوهُ بِبَعْضِهَا كَذَلِكَ يُحْيِي اللّهُ الْمَوْتَى وَيُرِيكُمْ آيَاتِهِ لَعَلَّكُمْ تَعْقِلُونَ (73)

[Al Quran ; 2:73]

Then We said: Strike him (the deceased) with part of it (the slain cow), thus Allah brings the dead to life, and He shows you His signs so that you may understand.


-> See mate, it is about the cow that Allah ordered to Jews to slay and strike a human dead body with it so he will be revived and tell them who killed him, in the verse above the human dead body was replaced with the damir Hu and the damir is attached to the word Idrab: اضْرِبُوهُ , i.e. strike him

Here is another example:

فَأَوْحَيْنَا إِلَى مُوسَى أَنِ اضْرِب بِّعَصَاكَ الْبَحْرَ فَانفَلَقَ فَكَانَ كُلُّ فِرْقٍ كَالطَّوْدِ الْعَظِيمِ (63)

[The Quran ; 26:63]

Then We revealed to Musa: Strike the sea with your staff. So it had cloven asunder, and each part was like a huge mound.


-> See, اضْرِب بِّعَصَاكَ الْبَحْرَ , i.e. Strike the sea with your staff[b], again we are told what Moses needed to strike and in this case it is [b]the sea

Now, if I give the staff and just told you to Idrab Biha period, i.e. I never informed you with what to strike then it can mean zillions of things, possibly beat trojan the donkey or ugly shitface, or manfrog filthy arse, or deluded mersick or a cow or a car, bloody zillions of things

Let�?????�????�???�??�?�¢??s now look at the verse provided by the donkey trojan and see if the freak has a point:

وَخُذْ بِيَدِكَ ضِغْثًا فَاضْرِب بِّهِ وَلَا تَحْنَثْ إِنَّا وَجَدْنَاهُ صَابِرًا نِعْمَ الْعَبْدُ إِنَّهُ أَوَّابٌ (44)

[The Quran ; 38:44]

here is Yusuf Ali and Picthal translations:

YUSUFALI: And take in thy hand a little grass, and strike therewith: and break not (thy oath). Truly We found him full of patience and constancy. How excellent in Our service! ever did he turn (to Us)!

PICKTHAL: And (it was said unto him): Take in thine hand a branch and smite therewith, and break not thine oath. Lo! We found him steadfast, how excellent a slave! Lo! he was ever turning in repentance (to his Lord).


LOL

-> See dear brother how I got the confused goons red handed with ease, what a show:

-> Here is what the verse above told us: فَاضْرِب بِّهِ , and as translated by the above two : and strike therewith & and smite therewith, i.e. we were not told what Ayoub should have beaten, it can be zillions of things, here it is again: possibly his wife or the ground, or the sea, or a dead body, or a sheep or a cow, or a filthy kafir like ugly shitface, or a punk of a kafir like donkey trojan or a sick of a kafir like mersick or a hero like you or an arse kicker like me, LOL, zillions of things mate

That is the mother of all slam dunks don�?????�????�???�??�?�¢??t you reckon dear brother?

Here it is just in case you reckon?:


Take care


I know, Ahmed and I knew the jokers do not understand Arabic. I was using their biblical stories which came to us through their own traditions and stories. Hence, instead of wasting time, I mentioned Job's wife asking him to curse God and die. LOL!

There is no mention in Qur'aan of beating his wife. It could even be striking the "shaitan" or his own feet. If the verse were about beating his wife, it would not be fad-rib bihi. The goons do not know the meaning of bi-hi, which means simply "with it". There is no 'ha' to indicate her. LOL!

You are right. Good job.

Salaams
BMZ
- Sat 10 Nov, 2007 4:41 am
Post subject:
Excellent article bro

We are not told as to what Ayoub was instructed to strike so the filthy kafirs have no case against this Noble Verse. Bro, I do think it's time to put Manfred on the Wall of Shame. He seriously is irritating and he attacks Islam through ignorance but he can't even defend his bloody Bible.

If there is any coward on the FFI forum, it is Manfred without a doubt.

Take care bro
- Sat 10 Nov, 2007 7:08 am
Post subject:
Hello BMZ and IW

BMZ, the freaks banned you again, I'm really surprised, I guess they acted shifty to ban you again

anyway, I'm happy not to waste further time in there and just copy their crap in here and reply to it between us and the publis should read it in here

I just donlt want you giys to feel that you have been left out

Take care guys
- Sat 10 Nov, 2007 12:52 pm
Post subject:
AhmedBahgat wrote:
Hello BMZ and IW

BMZ, the freaks banned you again, I'm really surprised, I guess they acted shifty to ban you again

anyway, I'm happy not to waste further time in there and just copy their crap in here and reply to it between us and the publis should read it in here

I just dont want you giys to feel that you have been left out

Take care guys


Salaams, Ahmed

It is an anti-Islam site and the goons and freaks cannot stand when knowledgeable Muslims expose their lies and they feel threatened and exposed.

I am sure they will come and read here. We can always bring up topics here to discuss the character of various FFI/Ali Sina's goons to this site. LOL!

Ali Sina is an internet character and you will be surprised to know that many people in real life have never heard of him.

BMZ
- Sat 10 Nov, 2007 1:34 pm
Post subject:
AhmedBahgat wrote:
Hello BMZ and IW

BMZ, the freaks banned you again, I'm really surprised, I guess they acted shifty to ban you again

anyway, I'm happy not to waste further time in there and just copy their crap in here and reply to it between us and the publis should read it in here

I just donlt want you giys to feel that you have been left out

Take care guys


Bro, it's best to ignore their crap and only reply when you have something relevent to say or if you want to insult someone. That was my attitude during my last week at FFI.

I'm not left out bro LOL. I'm watching the forum closely even though I'm not participating. I spend about 20 minutes a day reading the forum LOL Very Happy

And I realized that no one is dumber than the person who calls herself MsWesterner. Just reading her current posts disgusts me to the core
- Sat 10 Nov, 2007 4:26 pm
Post subject:
IntellectualWarfare1 wrote:
AhmedBahgat wrote:
Hello BMZ and IW

BMZ, the freaks banned you again, I'm really surprised, I guess they acted shifty to ban you again

anyway, I'm happy not to waste further time in there and just copy their crap in here and reply to it between us and the publis should read it in here

I just donlt want you giys to feel that you have been left out

Take care guys


Bro, it's best to ignore their crap and only reply when you have something relevent to say or if you want to insult someone. That was my attitude during my last week at FFI.

I'm not left out bro LOL. I'm watching the forum closely even though I'm not participating. I spend about 20 minutes a day reading the forum LOL Very Happy

And I realized that no one is dumber than the person who calls herself MsWesterner. Just reading her current posts disgusts me to the core


Yes, bro. I ignore many of the FFI goons who are just the nodders. I think Ms.W is Ali Sina's side-kick. LOL!
All I see from her is parroting out the same comments. Will somebody tell the woman to at least think and write something instead of her 2-3 standard liners? LOL!

Salaams
BMZ
All times are GMT + 10 Hours
Powered by phpBB 2.0 .0.17 © 2001 phpBB Group